Evaluation Criteria
Projects will be evaluated based on the following weighted criteria
Innovation
Originality and creativity of the solution, novelty of approach, and innovative use of AI technologies to address urban challenges.
Technical Implementation
Quality of code, technical complexity, proper use of AI/ML algorithms, and overall technical excellence of the implementation.
Impact
Potential real-world impact on smart cities, scalability of the solution, and ability to address significant urban problems.
Feasibility
Practicality of implementation, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and viability of the solution in real-world scenarios.
Presentation
Clarity of presentation, quality of demonstration, ability to communicate ideas effectively, and overall presentation skills.
Score Breakdown
Total Points Distribution
Rules & Regulations
All participants must adhere to the following rules and regulations throughout the hackathon:
- Plagiarism Policy: Any form of plagiarism will lead to immediate disqualification. All work must be original.
- Original Work Only: Submissions must be the original work of team members. No third-party copyrighted material without proper attribution.
- Deadline Adherence: Late submissions will not be accepted under any circumstances. Plan your time accordingly.
- Judges' Decision: The decision of the judging panel will be final and binding on all participants.
- Deadline Compliance: Teams must follow all deadlines strictly as mentioned in the timeline.
- Code of Conduct: All participants must maintain professional conduct throughout the hackathon.
- Submission Format: All submissions must follow the specified format and guidelines.
- Team Participation: Only registered team members are allowed to participate and present.
- Intellectual Property: Participants retain ownership of their intellectual property.
- Documentation: Proper documentation is mandatory for all submissions.
Evaluation Process
Understanding how your project will be evaluated through different stages
Initial Screening
All submissions undergo initial screening for completeness and compliance with guidelines before proceeding to evaluation.
Expert Review
Qualified submissions are reviewed by industry experts and academic professionals based on the evaluation criteria.
Technical Assessment
Technical evaluation of code quality, implementation, and functionality of the submitted projects.
Final Selection
Finalists are selected based on cumulative scores and invited for presentation to the judging panel.
Ready to Excel?
Focus on innovation, technical excellence, and real-world impact. Start preparing your project with these evaluation criteria in mind.